Friday, March 28, 2008
![]()
what is it with people that they fail to notice that the world is
changing. what used to be taboo has evolved to be what is the social norm, or at least grudgingly accepted by the society. take for example, piercings. ear piercings in the 18th/19th century used to be looked upon as exotic. then, 2 ear piercings on FEMALES became the social norm. when MALES started to pierce their ears too, it was met with much resistance from the society. later, guys are supposed to only pierce their left ear lobe or be gay. now, everywhere you go, you see guys with piercings on both ear lobes. what does that make them? bisexuals? fortunately, the world has changed by now, and this is only a fashion statement. then there is the case of tattoos. originally used to mark convicts so that society can tell them apart. it caught on with gangs, making a particular design as one of their own. the yakuza, for example, are famous/ infamous for their full body tattos. around the same time, or maybe later, it became an art form as well. hence, not everyone in the streets who sport a tattoo is with a gang. but much of the world, at least on this side of the world, has not caught on with the new meaning of tattoos and insist that it's a sign of a negative vibe. it never cease to iritate me when people point out a person with a tattoo or one too many piercings and single them out as 'bad people'. it can be a form of art, a way of expressing themselves, a way of insolating themselves from the world that is so (damn) narrow-minded. what you do not agree with does not mean that it is wrong. even the gods do not make decisions for us mortals. what right have you to judge a person on the street just by his/ her appearance? and who said that we are a racial harmonious society? people would not look down on couples of two differnt race if we were so harmonious. just because a chinese and an indian is dating, a 'kind hearted, well meaning' (NOT) relative insults the family by saying the head of the family has not done his duty well, hence the child is dating one of another race. if the relative happened to have an sibling-in-law who is of another race, is he about to insult his own father as not having done his duty as the head of the family well? well, he ain't about to say that, is he? he would inevitably insult himself in the same breath. well, i have news for you, dear relative. STOP BULLSHITTING! one day, you will be made to eat up all the rubbish you have uttered. mark my words. -aeRieL-
|
Other Links
-[33/06]-
|